CARNEGIE HALL PRESENTS

Performance Saturday, March 10, 2012 | 8 PM

St. Louis Symphony

Stern Auditorium / Perelman Stage
Pre-concert talk starts at 7:00 PM in Stern Auditorium/Perelman Stage with David Robertson in conversation with Jeremy Geffen, Director of Artistic Planning, Carnegie Hall.

Karita Mattila
joins David Robertson and the St. Louis Symphony for a performance of Quatre Instants, which Kaija Saariaho wrote specifically for the Finnish soprano. When Mattila premiered the work at the 2003 Ekenäs festival, critics called the performance “irresistible” (Le Monde). Paired with Stravinsky’s Firebird, it’s a concert you can’t miss.
Back to Event Details
Print Program Notes

The Program

CLAUDE DEBUSSY
Printemps


About the Work


Even as a student, Claude Debussy’s music was condemned for “vague impressionism,” what Debussy’s conservatory teachers believed to be “one of the most dangerous enemies of works of art.” This particular rebuke came while he was composing in Rome. As a winner of the coveted Prix de Rome, Debussy was obliged to write four works for academic approval, one of which was the completed piano score of his Printemps. Intended by Debussy as music “covering a great range of feelings,” the evocative two-part piece personified for the French composer the “joy of being born into a new time” after the “slow miserable death of Nature.”

But Debussy’s teachers didn’t approve. And his experience in Rome—even surrounded by the city’s commanding scenery and the palatial Villa Medici—was anything but joyful. He found his musical colleagues to be affected and the creative environment oppressive. Shortly after completing Printemps, Debussy left the three-year scholarship program early, thus setting up an irrevocable break with the musical academic world.

Debussy had planned Printemps for orchestra and humming chorus. It’s believed that this scored version was destroyed in a bindery fire in Rome. In 1912, many years after Debussy abandoned his early student effort, he worked with the French conductor, composer, and Gounod protégé Henri Büsser in re-orchestrating (minus chorus) the piano score. Printemps thus became the earliest orchestral work by Debussy to have entered the repertoire.


A Closer Listen


For Debussy’s critics, impressionism was a catch-all term for music that deviated too much from conventional harmonic practice and the fundamentals of traditional form. For instance, Printemps is awash in ninth chords, which, to the chagrin of Debussy’s conservative contemporaries, were used more for the purposes of ornamentation than structural harmony.

Composed in the winter months of 1887, Printemps predates many of the so-called formative moments in Debussy’s career: the 1889 Paris Exposition, for example, where he was exposed to the music of Java and Indochina, as well as his 1888 and 1889 visits to Bayreuth, the Richard Wagner shrine and opera house where Debussy first heard Parsifal. Even so, there’s much in Printemps that foreshadows Debussy’s more mature works. The solo introduction of the first movement theme is similar to the lone flute in Prelude to the Afternoon of a Faun. The pentatonic nature of this gentle melody and the oriental sounds at the beginning of the second movement also recall the exoticism of many of Debussy’s later pieces.

In the extroverted finale, both main themes are joined in a rich orchestral tapestry that fluently integrates the sounds of the piano. Although this work reveals nothing about Debussy an orchestrator, there’s enough here to suggest that Büsser was a conscientious and consummate craftsman.

—Matthew Erikson


KAIJA SAARIAHO
Quatre Instants


About the Composer


Kaija Saariaho is the first woman composer from Finland to gain international prominence and is widely regarded as one of the most influential composers working today. After studying at the Sibelius Academy and working at the famed IRCAM computer-music studio in Paris, Saariaho first became identified for compositions that explored varieties of new timbres, including the boundary between noise and music, the intermingling of orchestral and electronic sounds, and the tone colors of acoustical overtones. Along with her contemporaries Magnus Lindberg and Esa Pekka-Salonen, Saariaho was a co-founding member of the influential Finnish new music ensemble Korvat auki (Ears Open!).

In a 2000 interview, Saariaho spoke candidly about her musical journey: “When I was searching for my identity, many woman writers were important: Edith Södergran, Virginia Woolf, Sylvia Plath, Anaïs Nin. I was interested in how women writers and painters had been able to do this creative work, of which I didn’t find any satisfying examples in music.”

In recent years, Saariaho has turned to opera and song. In 2000, with librettist Amin Maalouf, Saariaho wrote the hauntingly meditative opera L’amour de loin (Love from Afar). Based on the life of a 12th-century troubadour, it won the prestigious Grawemeyer Award and has been performed throughout the world. Saariaho followed its success with the opera Adriana Mater in 2006 and in 2010 with Émilie, which is based on the life of 18th-century French mathematician Émilie du Châtelet.


In the Composer’s Own Words


Quatre Instants was born from Karita Mattila’s desire to have a new work to perform at recitals she was giving at the Théâtre du Châtelet and the Barbican Centre in April 2003. From my initial discussions with her, and knowing the vastly expressive spectrum of her voice, I immediately had a clear idea of the feelings that I wanted this work to evoke. I imagined a whole section of music built of contrasting images, sub-sections of which would be compressed into short but powerful moments. This reflection also gave the work its title: Four Instants. The fact that these instances are associated with different facets of love is without doubt connected to the fact that I have seen Karita play the role of a loving woman in so many opera productions.

The cycle was originally written for soprano and piano. Trying to extract the colors I had in my mind from the piano—while at the same time adapting its vast expressive scale to the diminutive vocal lines—reminded me of the work of a jeweler, who, with the help of a loop, creates rich, microscopic details. In the new version, I wanted to achieve the same very clear, bright sound as in the original. Because this version was composed for a Classical-sized orchestra rather than a large Romantic one, it retains some of the piano version’s chamber-music feel, so that the phrases we hear from the orchestral instruments—from the winds, and so on—are, in a way, in dialogue with the singer.

Since Karita and I are both from Finland, I first researched texts in our native language, but I couldn’t find anything that suited my musical ideas. I then contacted Amin Maalouf, whose texts I had worked with for previous projects, and asked him to suggest some to me. Amin gave me some short texts, from which I chose three, and I then asked him to write a fourth text based on the first three. It is this text that closes the cycle: In it the singer returns to the atmosphere of anticipation that is set at the beginning, but now her mind is full of memories. The apparent simplicity of Amin’s texts gives space for music. The words and short phrases are codes that hide a rich world of sensations, colors, and fragrances.

—Matthew Erikson


 

IGOR STRAVINSKY
The Firebird


About the Work


In 1910, Sergei Diaghilev’s Ballets Russes was in need of a different kind of centerpiece for its Paris season. No longer could the shrewd impresario count on the costly productions of Russian opera that had been the company’s mainstay. Instead, Diaghilev set his sights on a bold Russian ballet that could prove just as seductive, exotic, and successful with the Parisian public.

For many months, Alexandre Benois, Diaghilev’s designer, had been formulating ideas for a ballet based on Russian folklore. With the help of Diaghilev’s choreographer, Michel Fokine, the two devised a scenario that combined a number of different Russian fables: the beautiful but aloof Firebird, the demon Kastchei, and the archetypal Russian hero Ivan Tsarevich.

Ultimately, what Diaghilev, Benois, and Fokine envisioned was a grand integration of the arts, a sort of Gesamtkunstwerk for ballet. The only thing lacking in these early planning stages was the music. For The Firebird, Diaghilev had entertained several different composers—including Nikolai Tcherepnin, the company’s de facto house composer, Anatoly Lyadov, and Alexander Glazunov—before finally taking a chance on the promising and ambitious 28-year-old Igor Stravinsky. Diaghilev had heard Stravinsky’s Scherzo fantastique while in St. Petersburg and had previously invited him to orchestrate some of Chopin’s music for the Ballets Russes production of Les Sylphides.

Still, none of those efforts, or even his training with Rimsky-Korsakov, could fully prepare Stravinsky for the challenge ahead. Within a six-month period, Stravinsky supplied 45 minutes of music, almost all of it under the dictate of Fokine, who was exacting in his specifications for the ballet.

In the end, however, it turned out to be a serendipitous collaboration. A decade older than Stravinsky and with an astute musical ear, Diaghilev proved a valuable colleague and adviser. After the public sensation of The Firebird, the two forged one of the most important creative partnerships of the early 20th century, a period during which Stravinsky wrote the groundbreaking ballets The Rite of Spring, Petrushka, and Les noces.


A Closer Listen


According to musicologist Richard Taruskin, “Firebird was a ballet aspiring to the condition of opera, and this is what made it, for its time, a progressive and controversial experiment.”

Taruskin’s statement holds especially true in the portions of the ballet that involve pictorial description, dialogue, and other “recitative”-like moments—i.e., segments not commonly heard in the suite versions. Stravinsky’s daring use of harmony, orchestration, and form in these movements is nothing short of dazzling, particularly in Supplication of the Firebird, Magic Carillon, and Dialogue between Kastchei and Prince Ivan Tsarevich.

Still, even at its most original and progressive, this music owes much of its inspiration to Stravinsky’s musical forebears, particularly Rimsky-Korsakov. As examples of musical homage to Rimsky-Korsakov, Taruskin cites Stravinsky’s use of the octatonic and whole-tone scales, as well as alternating chains of major and minor thirds to distinguish the supernatural characters of the Firebird and Kastchei.

Stravinsky’s “borrowings” also extend to the natural-harmonic string glissandos at the end of the Introduction—a device used so memorably by Ravel in the Rapsodie espagnole. And the perky Dance of the Firebird recalls music in Scriabin’s ThePoem of Ecstasy.

Yet for a composer of such relative inexperience, Stravinsky’s Firebird is extraordinary in how it makes a complete break from the Russian ballet music of the past. And with The Firebird, Stravinsky’s revolutionary trajectory had just begun to take flight.

—Matthew Erikson


Kaija Saariaho is the holder of the 2011-2012 Richard and Barbara Debs Composer's Chair at Carnegie Hall.

Part of

You May Also Like

Wednesday, October 1, 2014
Carnegie Hall’s
Opening Night Gala
Berliner Philharmoniker


Thursday, October 2, 2014
Berliner Philharmoniker

Monday, October 13, 2014
Pretty Yende
Kamal Khan


Load Testing by Web Performance